Seen
Not described yet.
Of
These are claims by the holder and by Wikidata, read 2026-09-04, and join nothing until an editor confirms them.
- Holder's headings
- Men, Female Nudes
Means
No reading yet.
Shapes
Not yet checked. Suggested by an AI model, 2026-10-08.
- Platonic solids
Book four of Dürer’s treatise prints the regular solids as nets, flat drawings to cut out and fold, the first nets ever published. The page reproduced here is not one of them.
An AI reviewer had doubts, 2026-10-09: The source says "An early instance of polyhedral nets appears in the works of Albrecht Dürer" and that his book included nets for the Platonic solids, which supports the link. It does not say they were the first nets ever published, and it never names book four, so the note claims more than the evidence shows. The reproduced page does show column plans and German text about Vitruvius rather than nets, as the note says.
Source - Archimedean solids
The same book unfolds several Archimedean solids as nets beside the regular ones. The page reproduced here is not one of them.
An AI reviewer agreed, 2026-10-09: The source page says the book "included nets for the Platonic solids and several of the Archimedean solids", which matches the note's claim about the book. The reproduced page shows column bases and floor plan outlines with no solids or nets, so the note is right that this page is not one of them.
Source - Limaçon of Pascal
Dürer’s treatise gives geometric methods for drawing limaçons. The page reproduced here is not one of them: it shows column bases and ornamental outlines.
An AI reviewer agreed, 2026-10-09: The source page states "Dürer's Underweysung der Messung (Instruction in Measurement) contains specific geometric methods for producing limaçons." This supports the claim about the work. The picture matches the note's admission that this page is not one of those methods, since it shows stepped column profiles with bases on the left and lobed ornamental outlines on the right.
Source
Rights
- Credit
- Gift of Felix M. Warburg, 1918
- Licence
- CC0-1.0
- Evidence
- metmuseum.org collection api v1: isPublicDomain=true on object 336657 (read 2026-09-01)
- Record
- https://www.metmuseum.org/art/collection/search/336657

Also by Albrecht Dürer
22







Within fifty years of 1538, 1527, 1532
388
![[Woodcuts used to illus. Fables from incunabula...1966: the fox and the crane, ca. 1479 - item 57], Unknown](https://library.wrkhrs.co/artwork/loc-2007681460.jpg)






Also at Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York, NY
687







Similar picturesFound by visual likeness
8 picturesVisual resemblances suggested by the model. A match does not establish a shared subject or historical connection.








In the stacks
Not yet checked4Passages in the library’s own holdings that name this maker. The model ranked them; nobody has checked that the name means this person.
Drawing still retained something of the blunt, almost brutal frankness of statement, together with the sense of the characteristic which marked its earlier period. And it is perhaps this inheritance of Gothic directness of statement, this Gothic realism, that accounts for what is ultimately of most value in Dürer’s work. There exists in the Kunsthistorisches Akademie at Vienna a painting of a man, dated 1394, which shows how much of Dürer’s portraiture was already implicit in the Nuremberg school. In this remarkable work, executed, if we may trust the date,
0.73What, then, lies at the root of Dürer’s art is this Gothic sense of the characteristic, already menaced by the professional bravura of the late Gothic craftsman. The superstructure is what Dürer’s industry and intellectual acquisitiveness, acting in the peculiar conditions of his day, brought forth. It is in short what distinguishes him as the pioneer of the Renaissance in Germany. This new endeavour was in two directions, one due mainly to the trend of native ideas, the other to Italian influence. The former was concerned mainly with a new
0.72Up to the end of the fifteenth century the Gothic and ornamental feeling is still dominant in the treatment of the design of woodcuts in books, and most instructive and suggestive they are in simplicity of method and line, and directness of expression. Characteristic German work of Gothic feeling and considerable graphic force is seen in the woodcuts of the Nuremberg Chronicle (1493) designed by Michael Wolgemuth, the master of Albert Dürer. In these vigorous cuts we may plainly see the tradition of that Gothic feeling and style of graphic
0.72Dürer patterns do not coincide with objective facts, but for all that, they are lines, clear, ornamental patterns which are intended to be seen for themselves, which do not merely assert themselves in the impression of the whole but can hold their own even at the closest range. Therein lies the difference from the painterly foliage painting of the seventeenth century. If we wish to speak of premonitions of the painterly style, we shall find them rather in the fifteenth century than in the sixteenth. We find there, indeed, in
0.71