There are three common ways out. Each one gives the shopper a reason to choose that is not the price.

Your eyes and brain throw away most of what they see, because there is too much of it. What gets through is whatever does not match the things around it.
That means a brand that looks like the rest of its category is not just less interesting. Most people will not see it at all.


"The Bass Red Triangle was the first trade mark to be registered under the UK's Trade Marks Registration Act 1875."

Features describe what the product is: steel, four doors, 30 miles a gallon.
Benefits describe what it does for you: it gets you to work.
Experience describes how it feels to use: the drive is fun.
Identification says what owning it says about you: you are a Jeep person.
Each step became a new place to be different, because the step before it had gotten crowded.
They point to the writer Paul Hawken, who argued in 1983 that what a product means had started to matter more than what it is made of. Soon after, companies began paying huge sums to buy other companies just to get their brands, even when the products were nearly the same as everyone else's.
The positioning statement in your brief comes from this idea. Davis sends you to Ries and Trout if you want more.


Look at what the car ads of the time had in common: color photos, long cars, a happy couple, and a list of everything the car could do.
Volkswagen's ad broke almost every one of those habits. It is black and white, the car is tiny, most of the page is empty, and the writing is plain and a little funny about itself.
The car was different, so the ad was different too.
The difference started in the product: small, cheap, easy to fix, and the style never changed. The advertising made people feel that difference.

Every rental company said it was the biggest or the best. Hertz really was the biggest. Avis was losing money.
In 1962 the copywriter Paula Green, at the same agency that made "Think small," wrote ads that admitted Avis was number two and turned it into a promise:
Within about a year, Avis went from losing millions to making a profit for the first time in more than a decade.


For years Hertz said nothing. When Hertz finally answered, it was arguing on Avis's terms.
Avis also kept going. "No. 2ism" turned the idea into a set of beliefs the staff could work by, not only a line in an ad.
That is the test of a real difference: a whole brand can stand on it.



Polar bears, "I'd Like to Teach the World to Sing," the old bottle.
When Coke changed its formula in 1985, people took it as a betrayal, because the Innocent is supposed to stay the same.


The joke, the taste test, the younger crowd.
When Coke changed, Pepsi made fun of it. A teenager asks why Coke changed, tastes her first Pepsi, and says, "Now I know."
Mark and Pearson add one warning. A brand gets its difference from a meaning it keeps for years, not from a look it borrows for one campaign.
Mint was short and easy to spell. It suggested freshness and the green of American money, and it sounded like something you could trust in a category where trust matters most. Naming starts Oct 26, so start the name row of your map now.
On your map, circle the one row each path changes. Then write what in your research tells you to change it.




This is the copying problem from Part 2, happening to packaging. A squeeze bottle is easy to copy. A meaning the brand keeps for years, in everything it does, is not.
It is also the problem in the article from Monday, "Blame the Moodboard": when everyone looks at the same feeds, everyone ends up making the same thing. Your difference is safer when it comes from your own research, because nobody else has your research.
Edibles were packaged to look like Doritos, Cheetos, and Nerds. The FTC and FDA sent the makers letters telling them to stop.
"Marketing edible THC products that can be easily mistaken by children for regular foods is reckless and illegal."
Samuel Levine, FTC Bureau of Consumer Protection · July 5, 2023Bright, squishy pods looked like candy, and small children bit into them. The industry wrote a safety standard: packs you cannot see through and that are harder to open.
Ask of every path: could anyone mistake your product for the real thing, and get hurt because of it?